Karya Ilmiah
DISERTASI (0067) - National Enforcement Sebagai Pilihan Utama dalam Penuntutan Individu Pelaku Kejahatan Perang
-The dissertation is intended as an alternative choice for the settlement of
International Humanitarian Law violations, known as a war crime. With the
position of the individual as the main subject of the law of International
Humanitarian Law, national enforcement is the main option. National
enforcement in this regard includes the dissemination, regulation legislation,
monitoring and enforcement when there is a violation. There are several reasons
for this. First, international obligations for states to prosecute perpetrators of
international crimes is the enemy of mankind (hostis humanis generis), which is
based on international treaty obligations, universal jurisdiction, and jus cogens.
Second, the practice of an international tribunal to prosecute individuals who held
war crimes shows states not fully willing to surrender its nationals to other courts.
Third, the implementation of international courts (ad hoc /permanent) requires
high cost and long time. Fourth, national enforcement has actually been known for
a long time in international law through the principle of exhaustion of local
remedies. Fifth, for citizens who became actors, with the trial in his own country
would be more profitable, provided that held a fair trial. This is when compared if
taken to an international court.
Keywords: individual – individual criminal responsibility – war crimes – national
enforcement
090810036 | 0067 | Ruang Disertasi | Tersedia |
Tidak tersedia versi lain