AIRLANGGA LAW LIBRARY

  • Profil
    SejarahPustakawanJam Layanan
  • Layanan
    Cek TurnitinLibrary Class
  • koleksi
    e-book & e-journal
  • Fasilitas
  • Jadwal Kegiatan
  • Unduh
  • FAQ
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title

Karya Ilmiah

DISERTASI (177) - Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Kewenangan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Upaya Hukum Kasasi Atas Putusan Bebas Perkara Pidana

Syaiful Ma'Arif - Nama Orang; Prof. Dr. Didik Endro Purwoleksono, S.H., M.H - Nama Orang;

This dissertation entitled "The Constitutional Court Related Authority of the
Supreme Court of Cassation In Acquittal on Criminal Case" The research in this
dissertation concern the practice article 244 the Law of Criminal Procedure,
Decree of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M. 14-
PW.07.03 dated December 10th 1983, jurisprudence, and the Constitutional Court
decision No. 114/PUU-X/2012 dated March 26th 2013 raised legal issues
regarding the philosophical basis of the authority of the Supreme Court, setting
cassation against the acquittal of criminal case and the acquittal impact in the law
of criminal procedure againts existence of the Supreme constitution verdict No:
114 / PUU-X / 2012 dated March 26th 2013. Approach used is normative research
methods to approach law (Statute approach), Conceptual approach (Conseptual
approach), and the approach to the case (case approach). This research concluded
that acquittal is the protection of the rights of suspects / defendants as subjects not
an objects that need to be protected reffered to Pancasila point 2, article 28 D
paragraph (1) Constitution of Republic Indonesia and article 95 paragraph (1) and
artickle 97 Paragraph (1) the Law of Criminal Procedure. Sothe acquittal need to
be maintained and raised in Amendment Act No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of
Criminal Procedure.There is a conflict of norm or contradictory in cassation on
the acquittal in the Supreme Court Act between Article 30 appropriate with article
253 paragraph (1) the Law of Criminal Procedure with article 50 paragraph (2)
and article 52 Supreme Court Act, so its appropriate if changes rule in the
Supreme Court Actby deleting Article 50 paragraph (2) and Article 52 the
Supreme Court Act.

Keywords : regard to an acquittal, cassation, supreme court, court constitution.


Ketersediaan
031170150177Ruang DisertasiTersedia
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
177
Penerbit
Surabaya : Fakultas Hukum Unair., 2017
Deskripsi Fisik
-
Bahasa
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
NONE
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
PERKARA PIDANA
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
-
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
Tidak Ada Data
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

AIRLANGGA LAW LIBRARY
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

Airlangga Law Library adalah salah satu unit bagian akademik Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga yang memiliki tugas mengelola karya tulis, karya cetak, atau karya rekam secara profesional dengan sistem yang baku guna memenuhi kebutuhan informasi civitas akademika.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

© 2025 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik